Review by Geoffrey Wansell
The Times, Saturday August 26 1972

How the underground died and brought radical youth into politics

Flower power buds into revolution

The utopian idea of creating a gentle, but apolitical underground alternative society among young people in britain has died. Born in the balmy days of "flower power" and universal symbols of peace and love in the middle sixties, it has been quietly replaced by a potentially more significant awareness among the young.

As a testament to this transformation and an epitaph to the old underground , a heavily nostalgic history of the movement's metamorphosis is published this week. Called Watch Out Kids. Written partly by Mick Farren with Edward Barker (Open Gate Books, £1.50), former rock musician and one of the folk heroes of the alternative society, it is both a memorial to the heady days of the first hippies and a manifesto for a possible youth revolution. It should be essential reading for anyone anxious to understand the history of young people in the last effervescent decade.

The book's message is that hippies may continue to saunter the streets of San Francisco or London, their striving towards creating a separate society within the established order has gone . Youth style may remain, for that together with language has been the principal legacy of the underground, but beneath the hair and the peasant smocks there will possibly lurk a revolutionary.

Part of the transformation has already become obvious to the general, and sometimes mystified public. The activities of the Angry Brigade, for example, with which some young people may morally, if not entirely, sympathize, marks the first widespread publicity for the use of more aggressive political tactics.

Illustrated by Edward Barker, who with Farren worked on IT, the book may irritate some readers with its complex graphics, but it repays perseverance. For it offers not only a history of the underground and its ideals but also an invaluable insight for anyone of a different generation into the "youth revolution".

It accurately and sympathetically depicts the feelings of many young people throughout the sixties. It charts the rise of the rockers and the mods, the appearance of the beats, the changes as "flower power" and the UFO club opened in London, the rise of rock music festivals and the appearance of political anger among the young.

Assessing the origins of the underground, the authors state perceptively, "CND, although a predominantly youth organization, seemed divorced from the instinctive revolt of the rock and roll teenage rebels...Ban the bomb marches had a usefulness, however, in terms of the interchange of information between traditional pacifists, left wingers and young political freaks".

"The later sitdowns and civil disobedience campaigns also brought many middle class kids into contact with police repression. It was also around the CND environment that a number of us first came into contact with the reality of of smoking dope."

Indeed, explaining the origins of the first large scale experiments with drugs among the young, the authors add that the "mods" in 1964 and 1965 depended upon stimulants to keep them awake while they visited rock clubs in London. "Cannabis lacked immediacy and was too slow and cerebral, so although many mods picked up the practice of regular dope smoking, it was of little use in terms of easing them through the intense competitive technicolour weekend. They found the answer in pills like Drinamyl (blues or purple hearts)."

They say the other effect of pills on young people was to give them a sense of confidence in themselves.

"1967", they go on, "was the year of the great hippie legend. It was the year in which hundreds of thousands of kids said enough to aggression, competition and wanton destruction of the society in which they had grown up.

"It was the year in which a generation who lived with both rock and roll and the shadow of the bomb decided it was time that a society should be formed that operated on principles of trust, of love and sharing, rather than the current ones of fear, self-interest and hate. Instead of waging violent revolution, they simply said 'later for straight society' and dropped out, attempting to create a separate way of life that would convert others by example."

It was at this time, they explain, that the main public features of the underground emerged: "IT and OZ established themselves as a solid part of the scene, even underground self-help and welfare organizations, like Release and the Diggers, came into being." (The latest edition of IT charts the decline and ultimate closure of 14 alternative publications since those halcyon days.)

But they explain bleakly, "The problem only to be discovered later was that no genuine sense of community developed and all those freaks who had successfully conducted one of the greatest revolutions in style and attitude in just one summer were not emotionally involved with each other to a great enough a degree to prevent them losing much of what they gained, as winter and hard times began to close in".

By 1968 they point out that many young people had already chosen to experiment with a wider range of often illegal drugs. They attribute this to a growing dissatisfaction with the existing society. But they add that others chose to participate in demonstrations against the Vietnam War as their sign of dislike for the existing order. (This was probably the origin of the aggressive political talking among many young people.)

Perhaps the first public breath of life for the change in the underground was in November 1970 when Jerry Rubin, the American Yippie leader, invaded the David Frost television programme in London with a group of British hippies, including Mick Farren.

The trial of the Oz magazine that followed in the summer of 1971 was probably the last public airing for the values of the original underground and its preoccupation with rock music, drugs, and sexual adventure.

They attribute the change of attitude among young people to the election of a Conservative Government in June 1970. They quote Richard Neville, joint editor of Oz and probably the most eloquent of the underground's prophets, when he said of the Oz obscenity case: "There is only inch of difference between Labour and Conservative: it is, however, the inch in which we have to live and work."

The recent politicization that has spread through youth", Farren and Barker add, "the bombings and the campus riots, are not the start of the revolution, they are the defence against an increasing external threat. Youth culture can work out fine when it is left alone."

"The bombs of the Angry Brigade and the Weathermen are the result of the constant attempts to destroy it. They are a warning to the death culture. The private property of out parents has become the target for a symbolic vengeance for the lives that have been wantonly destroyed."

By the end of their account of the life and times of the Britain's youth during the last decade they say: "The rapid spread of youth culture is the result of the kids themselves evolving a new way of living despite all the massive opposition thrown against them. Hundreds of thousands of white kids became social outcasts rather than join their parents' death culture, is surely the most positive, if disorganized, revolutionary statement in history."

They also offer a manifesto for the new political aims of young people. Among a myriad of demands they call for a "Free planet, free land, free food, free shelter, free clothing, free music, free culture, free media, free technology, free education, free health care, free bodies, free people, free time and space, everything free...for everybody."

With considerable nostalgia Mick Farren and Edward Barker say, "The feeling of community that was about to emerge three years ago has scattered and split". But they add darkly that the new vision of the future offered in the manifesto will require violence to defend it from a "civilization that, as it falls, would rather destroy everything with it than admit it was wrong".

It is impossible to assess how many young people would accept that analysis, but it remains certain proof that the gentle conception of a society among the young of amiable hippies, interested only in living their lives by separate values, has evaporated.